Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01226
Original file (PD 2012 01226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2012-01226
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20140925
SEPARATION DATE: 20030812


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PO3/E-4 (HM3/Hospital Corpsman) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements and she was referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic LBP condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic LBP as unfitting, rated at 0% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “The same doctor that did my med board did my first eval for the VA. On the med board I was rated for back pain only, but when I was evaluated by the VA they rated the L5 S1 herniation & left leg weakness/foot drop”.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic LBP condition is addressed below. The Board will also review any neurologic deficit as related to the LBP and contention by the CI regarding the left leg weakness/foot drop. The Board must emphasize that disability compensation may only be offered for those conditions that cut short the member’s service career. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20030424 VA - (4 Yrs. Post-Separation)
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5295 0% Herniated Disc AT L5-S1 5243 10% 20071127
Other x 0 (Not in Scope) Other x 15 20071127
Combined: 0% Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 71127 ( most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests ratings should have been conferred for other conditions documented at the time of separation. The Board wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short the member’s career and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service connected conditions and to periodically reevaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the veteran’s disability rating should his degree of impairment vary over time.

The Board also acknowledges that the original VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination and VARD were referenced, but not available in the evidence before it and could not be located after numerous requested inquiries. Further attempts at obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile and introduce further delay in processing the case. The missing evidence will be referenced below in relevant context and it is not suspected that the missing evidence would significantly alter the Board’s recommendations.

Low Back Pain Condition. The 2003 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of the CI’s separation, were updated 23 September 2002 for code 5293 (incapacitating episodes) and then changed to the current §4.71a rating standards on
26 September 2003. The older VASRD standards for rating based on range-of-motion (ROM) impairment were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, whereas the current standards specify rating thresholds in degrees of ROM impairment. The VASRD normal ROM values, that are listed, were not in effect prior to 26 September 2003 and are for the combined thoracolumbar spine segment, whereas the older spine criteria considered the thoracic and lumbar spine segments separately. For the reader’s convenience, the relevant 2003 rating codes under discussion in this case are excerpted here.

5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar:
Severe……….40; Moderate……….20; Slight……….10
5293 Intervertebral disc syndrome:
With incapacitating episodes having a total duration
…of at least two weeks but less than four weeks during the past 12 months.......20
…of at least one week but less than two weeks during the past 12 months ........10
5295 Lumbosacral strain:
With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing position……………………20
With characteristic pain on motion..................10
With slight subjective symptoms only...............0

The CI initially was seen for LBP associated with pain extending into bilateral hips and left leg shortly after falling on the floor while being transferred from the operating room table to a recover room stretcher in October 2000. A magnetic resonance image (MRI) performed on 30 October 2000 revealed an L5-S1 disc herniation without neurologic involvement. Although not present in the case file, there were documentation in the service treatment record (STR) of a second MRI dated 30 May 2001, which revealed the CI was “…without significant change” from prior exam. Electro-diagnostic testing was normal. Despite medication, physical therapy, profiling, manipulations, pain management and [steroid] spinal injections, the CI continued to have intermittently discomfort in her back. The CI was not considered a surgical candidate and pain management diagnosed a strain of her left sacral-iliac (SI) joint and illiolumbar ligament with L3 radicular symptoms. The STR contained very little documentation that indicated decreased and painful spinal motion. Lumbar spasms were infrequently identified and there were inconsistent notations of the affected spinal dermatome noting various levels between L3 to S1.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination (performed 8 months prior to separation), the CI indicated a constant LBP with intermittent severe exacerbations occasionally radiating down her left leg; however, the examiner noted “…pain is primarily in her back.” Symptoms were increased with prolonged standing, walking and running. On examination, the CI had left lumbar and SI tenderness without spasms. Neurovascular, sensory and strength parameters were normal to the back and lower extremities. There was “full” thoracolumbar ROM. There were no periods of incapacitation. The diagnosis was chronic LBP and the examiner indicated that her symptoms were “sufficient enough to preclude her normal activities”; however, there was no functional defining of her “normal activities.”

Absent the original VA C&P examination and VARD, a subsequent 4 year post-service VARD indicated an original VA rating of 10%, for the CI’s lumbosacral herniated disc with radiculopathy, which was later increased to 20%.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the back condition as 5295 (lumbosacral strain) and rated at 0%. The VA’s rating of 10% was under the current VASRD §4.71a, rated as code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) which was not in effect at the time of the CI’s date of separation. The majority of STRs reflected full spinal ROM or did not document any motion deficit from 2000 to 2002. The first recorded evidence of limited ROM was dated 25 November 2002, noting global decrease ROM without providing comments on actual measurements. The NARSUM (performed 3 weeks later), revealed “full” ROM. Utilizing code 5295 (lumbosacral strain), Board members agreed that sufficient evidence was present to meet the 10% criteria with painful motion. Board members also agreed that any description of decreased ROM would not be supported above the 10% rating under code 5292 and without periods of incapacitation, code 5293 was not applicable as well. Although not commented on by the NARSUM, the STR (a month prior to the NARSUM being dictated) clearly documented (++) “muscle spasms” in the lumbosacral spine, possibly in support of a higher rating. Members extensively deliberated and concluded that the objective evidence of significant back spasms (8 months prior to separation) did not support their presence at the time of separation and therefore, did not meet the 20% impairment level.

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of the VASRD spine standards in effect at the time of separation, the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the low back condition. Additionally, Board members considered the left leg weakness/foot drop as contented by the CI and determined that the MEB’s finding of “normal” neurovascular and strength as documented for both lower extremities did not impose any direct limitation on fitness and therefore, cannot recommend an additional separation rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW 2003 VASRD, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% coded under 5295. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain Condition 5295 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120711, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
                  DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
        
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) PDBR ltr dtd 26 Feb 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (c) PDBR ltr dtd 21 Jan 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (d) PDBR ltr dtd 13 Jan 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (e) PDBR ltr dtd 5 Feb 13 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (f) PDBR ltr dtd 28 Feb 15 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (f).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Disability separation with final disability rating of 10 percent (increased from 0 percent) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 70 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

d. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 30 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

e. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Disability separation with final disability rating of 10 percent (increased from 0 percent) effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are completed.



         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         Assistant General Counsel
                         (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02105

    Original file (PD-2014-02105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Low Back Condition . The Board considered the 5292 limitation of motion code and noted there were no entries in the treatment records to support a rating under this code since all of the recorded ROM were described as full.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00938

    Original file (PD 2012 00938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The PEB rated the CI’s back pain condition at 10%, coded 5295 (lumbosacral strain) citing pain with motion without spasm (but also noted moderate limitation of motion). RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020

    Original file (PD-2012-01020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00857

    Original file (PD2012-00857.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Lumbar spine X‐rays 25 October 2002 were normal including normal intervertebral disc spaces. The VA rated 40% citing limitation of motion at the time of the C&P examinations over a year after separation (coded 5293‐5292). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR‐RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00551

    Original file (PD2011-00551.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    In 1999, the CI was referred for MEB due to chronic back pain, and he experienced increased symptoms of depression due to worry about his ability to remain in the U.S. and care for his family since he was not yet a U.S. citizen. VA C&P examinations therefore would be expected to be performed in a manner that would report examination findings consistent with the rating guidelines, in this case a lumbar range of motion rather than the combined thoracolumbar ROM that is measured and used under...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01434

    Original file (PD-2012-01434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201434 SEPARATION DATE: 20021001 BOARD DATE: 20130301 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (19K/M1 Gunner), medically separated for low back pain (LBP) with history of radiation to the right buttock and to bottom of the foot. Pre/Post-Separation) – All Effective Date...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00117

    Original file (PD2013 00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Spine surgery evaluation concluded there was no indication for surgery.The MEB physical examination on29January 2002 (DD Form 2808) recorded “ROM 45 degrees anterior flexion” but did not specify whether this was lumbar spine or trunk motion.The orthopedic MEB narrative summary addendum examination on30March 2002, recorded back flexion with fingers reaching to mid shin (approximately 70 degrees), similar to the physical therapy examination the year previously.There was tenderness to palpation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00708

    Original file (PD2012-00708.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB rated the condition 10% based on pain on forward motion under the 5295 code for lumbosacral strain. The VA reported 90 degrees of lumbar forward flexion and ROMs were consistent with near-normal ROMs from the AMA guidelines in effect at the time, and the Board adjudged these as slight limitation (IAW 5292, Spine, limitation of lumbar motion). Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058

    Original file (PD2012-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01541

    Original file (PD-2012-01541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic LBP condition, characterized as “mechanical low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Spondylosis of the Lumbosacral Spine 5295 10% 20020226 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x N/A Combined: 10% Combined: 10% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Chronic Low Back Pain Condition: The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM), dated 03 May 2001, 5 months prior to...